Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://172.16.16.104:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/422
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHiremath, Geeta-
dc.contributor.authorNaik, Balaram-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-20T05:04:35Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-20T05:04:35Z-
dc.date.issued2021-01-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://172.16.16.104:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/422-
dc.description.abstractAim of the study: To compare the microleakage in teeth restored using silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and dental varnish under amalgam restoration. Materials and methods: Twenty premolar teeth were used in the study. Class I cavity was prepared and restored using silver amalgam. In group I, the dental varnish was used under restoration, and in group II, the SDF was used. All samples were tested for microleakage using methylene blue assay and evaluated under stereomicroscope. Results: Group I samples showed minimal microleakage when compared with group II with a p value <0.002. Conclusion: Silver diamine fluoride would not be an alternative to dental varnish.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSdmcdshen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistryen_US
dc.subjectDental varnish,en_US
dc.subjectSecondary caries,en_US
dc.subjectSilver diamine fluorideen_US
dc.titleComparison of Microleakage under Amalgam Restorationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Comparison of Microleakage under Amalgam Restoration

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison of Microleakage under Amalgam Restoration.pdf604.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.