Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://172.16.16.104:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/671
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNaik, Vishal B.-
dc.contributor.authorJain, Ashish K.-
dc.contributor.authorRao, Rahul D.-
dc.contributor.authorNaik, Balaram D.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T07:02:47Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T07:02:47Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-05-
dc.identifier.urihttp://172.16.16.104:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/671-
dc.description.abstractAdvances in adhesive technologies and escalation in esthetic demands have increased indications for tooth‑colored, partial coverage restorations. Recently, material knowledge has evolved, new materials have been developed, and no systematic review has answered the question posed by practitioners: Is the clinical efficacy of resin or ceramic better, for inlay, onlay, and overlay in the long run.en_US
dc.publisherJournal of Conservative Dentistryen_US
dc.subjectCeramics; composite resin; dental porcelain; dental restoration failure; dental restoration failure glass ceramics; longevityen_US
dc.titleComparative evaluation of clinical performance of ceramic and resin inlays, onlays, and overlays: A systematic review and meta analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of ceramic and resin inlays, onlays, and overlays: A systematic review and meta analysis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of.pdf1.14 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.