Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://172.16.16.104:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/741
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrishna, S. S. Suji-
dc.contributor.authorShashikumar, B.-
dc.contributor.authorNaik, Roopak D-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-08T05:45:02Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-08T05:45:02Z-
dc.date.issued2023-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://172.16.16.104:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/741-
dc.description.abstractThe study aimed to evaluate and compare the cervical spine posture in Class II division one patient treated with three different treatment modalities.en_US
dc.publisherContemporary Clinical Dentistryen_US
dc.subjectngle Class II division 1, BSS0, cephalometry, cervical spine posture, forsus, twin blocken_US
dc.titleEvaluation and Comparison of Cervical Spine Posture in Class II Division I Patients Treated with Twin Block Appliances, Forsus Appliances, and Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Cephalometric study.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Evaluation and Comparison of Cervical Spine Posture in Class II Division I Patients Treated with Twin Block Appliances, Forsus Appliances, and Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy: A Cephalometric Study

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evaluation and Comparison of Cervical Spine Posture in Class II.pdf1.51 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.